Creating custom drugs on a portable refrigerator-size device

This device built by MIT researchers can be reconfigured to manufacture several different types of pharmaceuticals (credit: courtesy of the researchers)

MIT researchers have developed a compact, portable pharmaceutical manufacturing system that can be reconfigured to produce a variety of drugs on demand — if you have the right chemicals.

The device could be rapidly deployed to produce drugs needed to handle an unexpected disease outbreak, to prevent a drug shortage caused by a manufacturing plant shutdown, or produce small quantities of drugs needed for clinical trials or to treat rare diseases, the researchers say.

Traditional “batch processing” drug manufacturing can take weeks or months. Active pharmaceutical ingredients are synthesized in chemical manufacturing plants and then shipped to other sites to be converted into a form that can be given to patients, such as tablets, drug solutions, or suspensions.

With research funded by DARPA’s Make-It program, the new system prototype can produce four drugs formulated as solutions or suspensions: Benadryl, Lidocaine, Valium, and Prozac. Using this apparatus, the researchers can manufacture about 1,000 doses of a given drug in 24 hours.

The key to the new system: chemical reactions that can take place as the reactants flow through relatively small tubes as opposed to the huge vats in which most pharmaceutical reactions now take place. Traditional batch processing is limited by the difficulty of cooling these vats, but the flow system allows reactions that produce a great deal of heat to be run safely.*

Personalized “orphan drugs”

One of the advantages of this small-scale system is that it could be used to make small amounts of drugs that would be prohibitively expensive to make in a large-scale plant. This would be useful for “orphan drugs” — drugs needed by a small number of patients. “Sometimes it’s very difficult to get those drugs, because economically it makes no sense to have a huge production operation for those,” says Klavs Jensen, the Warren K. Lewis Professor of Chemical Engineering at MIT and a senior author of a paper describing the new system in the March 31 online edition of Science.

The researchers are now working on the second phase of the project, which includes making the system about 40 percent smaller and producing drugs whose chemical syntheses are more complex. They are also working on producing tablets, which are more complicated to manufacture than liquid drugs.

*The chemical reactions required to synthesize each drug take place in the first of two modules. The reactions were designed so that they can take place at temperatures up to 250 degrees Celsius and pressures up to 17 atmospheres. By swapping in different module components, the researchers can easily reconfigure the system to produce different drugs. “Within a few hours we could change from one compound to the other,” Jensen says.

In the second module, the crude drug solution is purified by crystallization, filtered, and dried to remove solvent, then dissolved or suspended in water as the final dosage form. The researchers also incorporated an ultrasound monitoring system that ensures the formulated drug solution is at the correct concentration.


Abstract of On-demand continuous-flow production of pharmaceuticals in a compact, reconfigurable system

Pharmaceutical manufacturing typically uses batch processing at multiple locations. Disadvantages of this approach include long production times and the potential for supply chain disruptions. As a preliminary demonstration of an alternative approach, we report here the continuous-flow synthesis and formulation of active pharmaceutical ingredients in a compact, reconfigurable manufacturing platform. Continuous end-to-end synthesis in the refrigerator-sized [1.0 meter (width) × 0.7 meter (length) × 1.8 meter (height)] system produces sufficient quantities per day to supply hundreds to thousands of oral or topical liquid doses of diphenhydramine hydrochloride, lidocaine hydrochloride, diazepam, and fluoxetine hydrochloride that meet U.S. Pharmacopeia standards. Underlying this flexible plug-and-play approach are substantial enabling advances in continuous-flow synthesis, complex multistep sequence telescoping, reaction engineering equipment, and real-time formulation.

A flexible, transparent pressure sensor

Pressure sensors wrap around and conform to the shape of the fingers while still accurately measuring pressure distribution. (credit: 2016 Someya Laboratory)

Doctors may one day be able to physically screen for breast cancer using pressure-sensitive rubber gloves to detect tumors, thanks to a transparent, bendable, and sensitive pressure sensor newly developed by Japanese and American teams.

Conventional pressure sensors can’t measure pressure changes accurately once they are twisted or wrinkled, making them unsuitable for use on complex and moving surfaces, and they can’t be miniaturized below 100 micrometers (0.1 millimeters) thickness because of limitations in current production methods.

To address these issues, an international team of researchers led by Dr. Sungwon Lee and Professor Takao Someya of the University of Tokyo’s Graduate School of Engineeringhas developed a nanofiber-type pressure sensor made from carbon nanotubes and graphene that can measure pressure distribution of rounded surfaces such as an inflated balloon and maintain its sensing accuracy even when bent over a radius of 80 micrometers, equivalent to just twice the width of a human hair. The sensor is roughly 8 micrometers thick and can measure the pressure in 144 locations at once.

The device demonstrated in this study consists of organic transistors, electronic switches made from carbon and oxygen-based organic materials, and a pressure-sensitive nanofiber structure. Carbon nanotubes and graphene were added to an elastic polymer to create nanofibers with a diameter of 300 to 700 nanometers, which were then entangled with each other to form a transparent, thin and light porous structure.

The material may also have applications in improving the touch sensitivity in robots.


Abstract of A transparent bending-insensitive pressure sensor

Measuring small normal pressures is essential to accurately evaluate external stimuli in curvilinear and dynamic surfaces such as natural tissues. Usually, sensitive and spatially accurate pressure sensors are achieved through conformal contact with the surface; however, this also makes them sensitive to mechanical deformation (bending). Indeed, when a soft object is pressed by another soft object, the normal pressure cannot be measured independently from the mechanical stress. Here, we show a pressure sensor that measures only the normal pressure, even under extreme bending conditions. To reduce the bending sensitivity, we use composite nanofibres of carbon nanotubes and graphene. Our simulations show that these fibres change their relative alignment to accommodate bending deformation, thus reducing the strain in individual fibres. Pressure sensitivity is maintained down to a bending radius of 80 μm. To test the suitability of our sensor for soft robotics and medical applications, we fabricated an integrated sensor matrix that is only 2 μm thick. We show real-time (response time of ∼20 ms), large-area, normal pressure monitoring under different, complex bending conditions.

AI ‘alarmists’ nominated for 2015 ‘Luddite Award’

An 1844 engraving showing a post-1820s Jacquard loom (credit: public domain/Penny Magazine)

The Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF) today (Dec. 21) announced 10 nominees for its 2015 Luddite Award. The annual “honor” recognizes the year’s most egregious example of a government, organization, or individual stymieing the progress of technological innovation.

ITIF also opened an online poll and invited the public to help decide the “winner.” The result will be announced in late January.

The nominees include (in no specific order):

1. Alarmists, including respected luminaries such as Elon Musk, Stephen Hawking, and Bill Gates, touting an artificial- intelligence apocalypse.

2. Advocates, including Hawking and Noam Chomsky, seeking a ban on “killer robots.”

3. Vermont and other states limiting automatic license plate readers.

4. Europe, China, and others choosing taxi drivers over car-sharing passengers.

5. The U.S. paper industry opposing e-labeling.

6. California’s governor vetoing RFID tags in driver’s licenses.

7. Wyoming effectively outlawing citizen science.

8. The Federal Communications Commission limiting broadband innovation.

9. The Center for Food Safety fighting genetically improved food.

10. Ohio and other states banning red light cameras.

‘Paranoia about evil machines’

(credit: Paramount Pictures)

“Just as Ned Ludd wanted to smash mechanized looms and halt industrial progress in the 19th century, today’s neo-Luddites want to foil technological innovation to the detriment of the rest of society,” said Robert D. Atkinson, ITIF’s founder and president.

“If we want a world in which innovation thrives, then everyone’s New Year’s resolution should be to replace neo-Luddism with an attitude of risk-taking and faith in the future.”

Atkinson notes that “paranoia about evil machines has swirled around in popular culture for more than 200 years, and these claims continue to grip the popular imagination, in no small part because these apocalyptic ideas are widely represented in books, movies, and music.

“The last year alone saw blockbuster films with a parade of digital villains, such as Avengers: Age of Ultron, Ex Machina, and Terminator: Genisys.”

He also cites statements in Oxford professor Nick Bostrom’s book Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies, “reflecting the general fear that ‘superintelligence’ in machines could outperform ‘the best human minds in every field, including scientific creativity, general wisdom and social skills.’ Bostrom argues that artificial intelligence will advance to a point where its goals are no longer compatible with that of humans and, as a result, superintelligent machines will seek to enslave or exterminate us.”

“Raising such sci-fi doomsday scenarios just makes it harder for the public, policymakers,  and scientists to support more funding for AI research, Atkinson concludes. “Indeed, continuing the negative campaign against artificial intelligence could potentially dry up funding for AI research, other than money for how to control, rather than enable AI. What legislator wants to be known as ‘the godfather of the technology that destroyed the human race’?”

Not mentioned in the ITIF statement is the recently announced non-profit “OpenAI” research company founded by Elon Musk and associates, committing $1 billion toward their goal to advance digital intelligence in the way that is most likely to benefit humanity as a whole.”

The 2014 Luddite Award winners

The winners last year: the states of Arizona, Michigan, New Jersey, and Texas, for taking action to prevent Tesla from opening stores in their states to sell cars directly to consumers. Other nominees included:

  • National Rifle Association (NRA) for its opposition to smart guns
  • “Stop Smart Meters” Seeks To Stop Smart Innovation in Meters and Cars
  • Free Press Lobbies for Rules to Stop Innovation in Broadband Networks
  • The Media and Pundits Claiming That “Robots” Are Killing Jobs.

 

 

Telsa Motors to introduce new self-driving features Thursday

 

Tesla Model S (credit: Tesla)

Tesla Motors will introduce on Thursday (October 15, 2015) an advanced “beta test” set of autonomous driving features, The Wall Street Journal reports.

The software will allow hands- and feet-free driving in everything from stop-and-go traffic to highway speeds, and enables a car to park itself, the journal says. It will be available for 50,000 newer Model S cars world-wide via software download.

However, staying within licensing regulations, the software (at least the current version) requires the driver to grab the steering wheel every 10 seconds or so to avoid having the vehicle slow.

“Over time, long term, you won’t have to keep your hands on the wheel — we explicitly describe this as beta,” said Tesla Motors CEO Elon Musk at a press event. Notably, unlike other car makers, Tesla Motors is pushing the new features via an over-the-air software update.

 

 

 

New video series ‘Beyond the Desktop’ explores potential of 3-D printing

A five-episode video series called Beyond the Desktop that explores how additive manufacturing could affect the fields of medicine, aerospace, space technology and more has been released by the Wilson Center’s Science and Technology Innovation Program (STIP). The first episode was posted yesterday (Sept. 9); a new episode will be released each Wednesday through early October.

“Desktop 3-D printing has received significant media coverage, but this hides the larger story happening in industry, where the technology will change everything from prototyping to the production of complex parts and the design of supply chains,” says David Rejeski, director of the Science and Technology Innovation Program at the Wilson Center and executive producer of the series.

The series looks at how doctors are already incorporating 3-D printing into their surgical work, how aerospace manufacturers are finding cost savings in using additive manufacturing to build critical parts, and how startups are using 3-D printing to enable longer supply chains into space.

Beyond the Desktop builds upon other STIP work focused on additive manufacturing. Last month, the program released the results of a workshop that examined the environmental and human health implication of additive manufacturing. Sponsored by the National Science Foundation, the workshop was conducted in conjunction with the Center for Manufacturing Innovation at the University of Florida.

Beyond the Desktop was filmed on location in California, Illinois, and Washington, DC in 2013–2015.


Wilson Center | Beyond the Desktop: The Potential of Additive Manufacturing (Episode 1)